The place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management

نویسندگان

  • Pourhashemi, Mehdi Associate Professor, Research institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology
چکیده مقاله:

As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously.  Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each of MCDMs. In this research MCDs were evaluated with multi criteria. According to this, most practical methods of MCDM in forest management were selected. Then most criteria for the evaluating of MCDM were determined. Selections do with a team of forest management experts. AHP, FAHP, ANP, TOPSIS, VIKOR, WSM, DEA, Voting methods, PROMETHEE and ELECTRE were select for MCDM in forest management and Ease of using the method, Easily interpreted parameters, Ease of understanding the results, Ability of having detailed sensitivity analysis, Ability of using graphical design model, Ability of the team decision support, Ability of considering various constraints, Accuracy in determining the results and Velocity in the use of decision making method were determined as criteria for evaluation of MCDMs. In the second phase of research, experts weighted MCDM methods relative to criteria for evaluation of MCDMs with Likert scale. According to all criteria, AHP among the study methods is the optimal choice for decision making in forest management. Finally a SWOT analysis were done for better understand of results. Result show AHP method is not ideal multi-criteria optimization method. In other words, this method has some weaknesses. Most of the weaknesses linked to the use of experts. In case of non-professional experts in pairwise comparisons, weaknesses points are highlighted in using AHP.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making

In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...

متن کامل

Multi-criteria decision making based on DSmT-AHP

In this paper, we present an extension of the multicriteria decision making based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) which incorporates uncertain knowledge matrices for generating basic belief assignments (bba’s). The combination of priority vectors corresponding to bba’s related to each (sub)criterion is performed using the Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 proposed in Dezer...

متن کامل

Decision making in forest management with consideration of stochastic prices

  The optimal harvesting policy is calculated as a function of the entering stock, the price state, the harvesting cost, and the rate of interest in the capital market. In order to determine the optimal harvest schedule, the growth function and stumpage price process are estimated for the Swedish mixed species forests. The stumpage price is assumed to follow a stochastic Markov process. A stoch...

متن کامل

The Coupled Method Fuzzy-AHP Applys to Solve Multi-criteria Decision Making Problems

-The multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)problems with fuzzy preference information on alternatives are essential problems of the importance of weighting and ranking. In order to solve this problem, Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are coupled to form a new approach named Fuzzy-AHP.This method is different from the traditional FAHP,which used to facil...

متن کامل

Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators

This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده

{@ msg_add @}


عنوان ژورنال

دوره 6  شماره None

صفحات  75- 89

تاریخ انتشار 2016-06

با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.

کلمات کلیدی

کلمات کلیدی برای این مقاله ارائه نشده است

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023